a sidebar

Saturday, 8 October 2016

$15.5m Scam: Judge dismisses Jonathan aide's Plea

08-10-2016 


$15.5m Scam: Judge dismisses Jonathan aide's Plea

The Judge of the Fed­eral High Court sitting in Lagos, Justice Babs Kue­wumi, yesterday dismissed two applications brought before it by the former Spe­cial Assistant on Domestic Matters to Goodluck Jona­than, Waripam-Owei Em­manuel Dudafa and his co-defendant, Azubuike Briggs on the ground that the ap­plications constituted an abuse of court process.
According to a state­ment by the spokesman of the Economic and Finan­cial Crimes Commission (EFCC) Wilson Uwujaren, the 1st and 2nd defend­ants (Dudafa and Briggs) at the last adjourned date, brought separate applica­tions through their coun­sels, Gboyega Oyewale and Tochukwu Onyuike asking the court to set aside the “guilty plea” earlier entered by the 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th defendants.
Dudafa’s counsel, Oye­wale, feared that, the “guilty plea” entered by the four companies would adverse­ly affect them since the pro­ceedings were joint pro­ceedings and the first count bordered on conspiracy.
He also claimed that the purported directors of the companies stated in their statement to EFCC that they had nothing to do with the companies.
Onyiuke, on his part, challenged the jurisdiction and competence of Justice Kuewumi to even entertain the arraignment of the four companies, in the first place.
“The condition prec­edent to this Honourable Court assuming jurisdic­tion, to wit: authority to represent the 4th to 7th de­fendants by their purport­ed representatives further to Section 477(3) of the Administration of Crimi­nal Justice Act 2015, is com­pletely lacking”, Onyiuke ar­gued.
He said accepting the “guilty plea” of the compa­nies who admitted that they conspired with his client to launder the money would occasion a miscarriage of justice against his client.
Responding, counsel to EFCC, Rotimi Oyedepo urged the court to dismiss both applications as it was an abuse of court process at this stage after the court had already assumed juris­diction and the plea of the defendants had been taken.
According to him, it was too late for the 2nd defend­ant to challenge the juris­diction of the court.
Rotimi also called the attention of the court to the statements of accounts from Skye Bank where the $15.5m was kept, show­ing that Davies, Baro, Fre­drick and Ebenezer were the authorized persons with mandate to operate the ac­counts.
He said the accounts were opened pursuant to documents from the Cor­porate Affairs Commission, CAC, where Davies, Baro, Fredrick and Ebenezer were registered as directors in the companies.
“The prima facie evi­dence before Your Lordship is that those who appeared before Your Lordship are the directors of the 4th to 7th defendants”, Oyedepo submitted.
In his ruling, Justice Keuwumi agreed with the argument of the prosecu­tion that the applications were indeed an abuse of court process and accord­ingly dismissed same.
The case has been ad­journed to November 2, 2016 for trial.

No comments: